When Curiosity leads to Murder, Part II
Fallen City |
Another unexpected discovery in Wyoming was what appeared to be a car at the bottom of an outlook called Fallen City in the Big Horn National Forest. To some it might not seem like a big deal but after we returned home, my curiosity got the best of me. I had to see whether I could find any information to determine when or how someone might have ended up at the bottom of that valley. I thought the most I might find would be an article about a terrible crash after someone missed a corner on some cold, snowy, icy night.
Imagine the mountains covered in snow on a cold fall morning when three bodies are discovered in a cook tent; the deaths presumably the result of asphyxiation caused by a faulty stove. However, once the scene is disturbed and the bodies are removed, it is discovered the next day that the three men had actually been shot at close range.
So what do you think so far?
Once a confession is obtained, of course, the police arrest the subject and the state moves on towards prosecuting the miner at trial. During the trial the jury heard the miner’s confession and heard first-hand from the miner what happened from his point-of-view when he took the stand and claimed self-defense. When it was time for the judge to instruct the jury before deliberation, the defense made a point of arguing that the jury could only be instructed on First Degree Murder and not Second Degree Murder or even Manslaughter. The argument was all or nothing and when the prosecutor was not prepared to argue why the reduced charges should be an option, the judge agreed with the defense. This meant the prosecutor had to prove the miner killed all three men with premeditation.
Ending with a hung jury, the state brought the miner to trial a second time; this time in a different county and before a different judge. Where the state may have had a chance for a conviction during the first trial, the state did not stand a chance during the second one. It started when the judge ruled that the miner’s confession was not admissible and would not be heard by the jury. When a jail witness popped up as an informant against the miner, the evidence the state might have had was short-lived when the judge removed the witness from the stand after discovering a state agent was in the courtroom when he wasn’t supposed to be present.
I guess you can imagine what happened next.
Did the story end there? It depends on how you look at it. The victims’ families still had to live with only the miner’s confession on how and why the men had to die. They had to live with the fact that, while the miner may have been guilty of a crime, the state had not been able to put together a good case in order to convict him of the appropriate crime. However, the story took a turn for the worse with regard to the miner, not too long after the second trial. Apparently less than two years after the miner was acquitted, he passed away. I don’t know how, as that isn’t clear, and whether this even brought any relief to the victims’ families, I would not venture to say.
And what this case showed me is that when your curiosity takes hold, pay attention. You just never know the stories you might uncover.